Skip to content

Edinburgh Handedness Inventory

A free online version of the standardized handedness test used in research since 1971. Answer ten quick questions, get your laterality quotient, and see how the score is interpreted.

The Edinburgh Handedness Inventory was developed by R. C. Oldfield in 1971 and remains the most widely cited handedness assessment in scientific literature. It works by sampling hand preference across ten common activities — writing, throwing, using scissors, and so on — and combining the answers into a single number called the Laterality Quotient (LQ), which runs from -100 (purely left-handed) to +100 (purely right-handed).

Most people score near one of the two extremes. About 10% of the population scores in the strongly left-handed range; roughly 80% scores strongly right-handed; the rest fall somewhere in between, in what researchers call mixed-handedness.

Which hand do you use for each activity?

Pick the option that best matches your usual preference. If you've genuinely never thought about it, watch yourself do the task once before answering.

1. Writing

2. Drawing

3. Throwing

4. Using scissors

5. Toothbrush

6. Knife (without fork)

7. Spoon

8. Broom (which hand is on top)

9. Striking a match (which hand holds the match)

10. Opening a box (which hand removes the lid)

How the score is interpreted

Researchers use different thresholds depending on the study, but a common scheme is:

  • LQ ≤ -40: Left-handed
  • -40 < LQ < +40: Mixed-handed (sometimes called ambidextrous, though true ambidexterity is rare)
  • LQ ≥ +40: Right-handed

Stricter cutoffs (-60 and +60) are used in studies that want to exclude any mixed-handed participants. The 10% global figure for left-handedness is roughly the proportion scoring -40 or lower on this kind of inventory. For more on the population statistics, see our piece on left-handedness statistics.

What the score doesn't tell you

The LQ is a behavioral measure, not a brain measure. Two people with the same LQ can have meaningfully different patterns of brain lateralization for language, spatial processing, and motor control. About 95% of right-handers process language primarily in the left hemisphere; for left-handers the figure is closer to 70%, with the remaining 30% showing right-hemisphere or bilateral language processing. Hand preference correlates with brain organization, but it doesn't determine it.

For more on the underlying neuroscience, see our piece on the left-handed brain.

How this test is used in research

The Edinburgh Handedness Inventory has been administered in thousands of published studies. Common uses include:

  • Sample classification. Studies of brain lateralization or cognitive performance often need to know the handedness profile of their participants. The EHI provides a standardized way to report it.
  • Population estimates. Large-scale surveys use the EHI (or shortened versions of it) to estimate prevalence of left-handedness across countries, generations, and demographics.
  • Genetic research. Studies of the genetic basis of handedness use EHI scores to define phenotypes for analysis.
  • Clinical neuroscience. Researchers studying stroke, epilepsy, or surgical planning often need to know which hemisphere likely handles language — and handedness is one input to that estimate.

Limitations of the original inventory

Some of the 1971 items are dated. Most people don't strike matches anymore, and broom-handling assumes a household chore distribution that varies. Modern revisions of the inventory replace these items with more current ones — for example, "using a computer mouse" or "swiping a phone." The version above is the original 10-item Oldfield inventory, kept faithful to the standard form used in most published research.

The inventory also assumes you can answer about your usual preference with reasonable accuracy. People who were forced to switch hands as children, or who are genuinely mixed-handed, sometimes find their answers don't quite fit the available options. The "no preference" choice exists for these cases.

For broader context on what the score actually means, see our deep dive on left-handedness statistics for population data and historical trends, the left-handed brain for the neuroscience, and left-handed 101 for the field-guide overview. If you scored as a left-hander or mixed-hander, our piece on left-handed personality characteristics covers the cognitive and behavioral patterns associated with the trait.

Frequently asked questions

What is the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory?

The Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (EHI) is a 10-item questionnaire developed by R. C. Oldfield in 1971 to measure a person's hand preference across common daily activities. It produces a numerical Laterality Quotient (LQ) ranging from -100 (strongly left-handed) to +100 (strongly right-handed) and is the most widely used handedness assessment in scientific research.

How is the laterality quotient calculated?

Each of the 10 items is scored from -2 (always left) to +2 (always right). The scores are summed and divided by the maximum possible total (20), then multiplied by 100. The result is the LQ, ranging from -100 to +100.

What LQ score is considered left-handed?

A common cutoff used in research is an LQ of -40 or lower for left-handedness, -40 to +40 for mixed-handedness, and +40 or higher for right-handedness. Some studies use stricter thresholds (such as -60 and +60). The exact cutoff depends on the research context.

Can the test be wrong?

The test reflects how you reported your preferences. If your answers don't match your actual behavior — for example, because you were forced to switch hands as a child — the score may not reflect your natural handedness. Watch yourself perform the activities once and re-take the test if your gut says the score is off.

Is this a medical diagnosis?

No. The Edinburgh Handedness Inventory is a research instrument for classifying hand preference. It is not a clinical or medical diagnostic tool, and the score has no medical implications on its own.

Why are there only ten questions?

Oldfield's original 1971 paper landed on ten items as the smallest set that produced reliable, reproducible scores across populations. Shorter versions (4-item and 6-item) exist and correlate well with the full inventory, but the 10-item version remains the gold standard.